Josh Cook – Philosophy Editor

In an era whereby the experimental methods of reasoning have subsumed the vicinity of academic discourse, I believe that the field of Philosophy is required to analyse the presuppositions of such fields, and to view problems through different critical and historical contexts. The presumption that philosophical enquiry is a meaningless, superfluous or unnecessary mode of discourse however, has become ubiquitous to the academia of modernity, a view which I believe could not be more wrong. Philosophy is not a mere ‘armchair’ activity of empty discussion, rather the diametrical opposite; for each individual has their very own philosophy, whether that be an ethical, political, scientific, metaphysical, epistemic, religious or perhaps even an holistic system of thought, each of which drive the choices we make, not only in day to day discourse, but our most important decisions mustered by the volition. These ideas can spread towards political, cultural and paradigmatic movements, influencing entire populations upon a local and global scale. Thus, I believe that it is of the utmost importance to engage in philosophy through attempting to expunge dogmatism and ignorance (which could have disastrous consequences in the real world), in place of our best attempt to inculcate ‘good’ philosophy upon veracity and sound first principles.

Recent Articles:

Happiness from First Principles

Such are the vicissitudes in the pursuit of wisdom

The New Age Atheist

On balance capitalism is a better system for mankind than communism

In Defence of the Cosmological Argument

Irrefutable Scepticism? The Agrippan Trilemma

“There is no compelling reason to believe that objective moral facts exist.”

Hume’s Free Will

Causal Determinism

The Cause of Sublimity (and its importance in a cheapening world)

Is there room for freewill in a block universe?

In response to: ‘The intrinsic probability of an afterlife’ with recourse to Underdetermination

A brief overview of Bertrand Russell

The intrinsic probability of an afterlife

Anti-realism and the Ontological argument.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *